May v. Western Assur. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
Motion for New Trial. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
In this case it appears that the plaintiff, Mr. May, went to Judge Ames, an insurance agent in Minneapolis, who had been carrying his insurance for a series of years, and told him that he wanted $20,000 of insurance. Judge Ames knew the condition of the property, and he afterwards handed in to the plaintiff $20,000 of insurance; but Judge Ames, it seems, was unwilling to carry that amount in the company or companies that he represented, and therefore went to the agent of the defendant, Mr. Seeley, and offered him $2,500 of it, and Mi. Seeley took the insurance, wrote out the policy, and sent…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Pollock v. German Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. McTyierTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Farrington v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
- Farber v. American Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- California Reclamation Co. v. New Zealand InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.