Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. McTyier

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1924PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This appeal is from a judgment on a burglary insurance policy, resisted on the ground of change of title of the property insured without the consent of the company.

The policy, was originally issued to the husband of complainant, through F. B. Hunter & Co., local insurance agents, with whom the husband had various insurance transactions covering several years. Before the premium was paid by the originally insured, he went into bankruptcy. The property, a stock of merchandise was ’sold and purchased by his wife, the complainant. Soon thereafter a robbery occurred, followed shortly by another.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Continental Insurance v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Pollock v. German Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Alkan v. New Hampshire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Schomer v. Hekla Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bill Brown Construction Co. v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Diana Lynn TARRANT Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Chandler v. RoddyTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. TH Hayes & Sons v. Stuyvesant Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Collard v. Universal Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1935

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API