Legal Opinion

California Reclamation Co. v. New Zealand Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1913No. Civ. No. 1187PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order .refusing a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an action brought to recover upon an insurance policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, which by its terms insures “three thousand- dollars on account of California Reclamation Co., in case of loss to be paid to assured or their order, at and from San Francisco to San Pedro, upon his or their interest as owners in the body, machinery, tackle, apparel, and other furniture of the good dredge called the ‘San Francisco’ in tow tug ‘Sea Rover,’ valued at seventy-five thousand dollars.”

The facts out of which the action arose are briefly these: The California Reclamation Co., a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. McElroy v. British America Assur. Co. of TorontoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. Indiana Insurance v. HartwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. General Acc. Etc. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Williamson & Vollmer Engineering, Inc. v. Sequoia InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Maggini v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. De Campos v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Hampton Roads Carriers, Inc. v. Boston InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API