Legal Opinion

Consolidated School District No. 102 v. Walter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 12, 1954No. 36,298PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

This is an action brought by plaintiff to enjoin defendants from entering upon certain real estate and for an order of the court declaring the future rights of the parties with respect to the use and occupancy of the premises involved. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of defendants.

*160On November 2, 1863, Ebenezer Ayres and Ms wife conveyed a small tract of a larger portion of real property they owned to Common School District No. 29 of Washington county. The deed contained the following language which is significant here:

“To have and to hold all and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Caruthers v. LeonardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. North v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Slegel v. LauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Watkins v. BigelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Norton v. Duluth Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Wm. T. Burton Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  3. McDougall v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Dietz v. DietzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. HessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API