Legal Opinion

Slegel v. Lauer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1892No. Appeal, No. 355PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal, No. 355, Jan. T., 1891, by Rebecca Lauer, defendant, from decree of C. P. Berks Co., equity docket 1890, No. 507, in favor of Sue J. Siegel, executrix of Joel E. Siegel, deceased, plaintiff. Bill in equity for cancellation of deed constituting a cloud on plaintiff’s title.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 355, Jan. T., 1891, by Rebecca Lauer, defendant, from decree of C. P. Berks Co., equity docket 1890, No. 507, in favor of Sue J. Siegel, executrix of Joel E. Siegel, deceased, plaintiff. Bill in equity for cancellation of deed constituting a cloud on plaintiff’s title. The facts appear by the opinion of the court below, Endlich, J., which was as follows: “ Plaintiff is in possession of a strip of land, eight feet wide and 280 feet deep, in the city of Reading, adjoining on the south property of the estate of William Rhoads, Sr., deceased, which formerly belonged to the county of…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The opinion of the learned judge of the court below is so-full and satisfactory that we affirm the decree for the reasons there given by him.

The decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

2Cited by51 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Caruthers v. LeonardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. TW Phillips Gas and Oil Co. v. JedlickaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Thatcher's Drug Store of West Goshen, Inc. v. Consolidated Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API