Legal Opinion
State v. Roman Nose
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 22, 2002No. CX-01-1560PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.
Tony Allen Roman Nose, appellant, appeals from his conviction of first-degree murder during the commission of criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.185(2) (2000) for the July 11, 2000, killing of Jolene Stuedemann. Appellant claims that the trial court erred by failing to conduct a pretrial Frye-Mack hearing on the general acceptance within the relevant scientific community of the PCR-STR method of testing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) used by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) in this case. Appellant also claims that the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- People v. ShreckSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. BartyllaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.