Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 2004No. C4-02-835PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellant Billy Daymond Bailey was convicted of first-degree murder while committing criminal sexual conduct in connection with the May 1984 death of a 69-year-old neighborhood resident, Agnes Fafrowicz. On appeal to this court, he makes ten claims of error. Because prejudicial statements made by Bailey to police were erroneously admitted in evidence in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), we reverse and remand to the district court for a new trial. To provide guidance for the new trial, we also address the other…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re Commitment of SimonsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. State v. KendellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API