Legal Opinion
State v. MacK
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 1980No. 50036PublishedCited by 199 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice!
Defendant, petitioner herein, is being prosecuted in Hennepin County District Court for criminal sexual conduct in the first degree in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342(e)(i) (1978), and for aggravated assault in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.225, subd. 2 (1978). In the course of that prosecution, and before any determination of probable cause had been made, the district court certified to this court an important and doubtful question concerning the use of hypnotically-induced testimony in a criminal trial. It is a case of first impression. The precise question certified is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Harding v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- United States v. Lamar Adams, United States of America v. James Lee PinkertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by199 opinions
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.