Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 6, 1913No. 2695PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from County Court, Hughes County; P. W. Gardner, Judge. Action by Isaac Bloom against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

The plaintiff’s petition contains six counts; but at the trial the court refused to submit the first, third, and fifth counts to the jury. On the second, fourth, and sixth counts the jury returned a verdict for $123.95, upon which judgment was entered for the plaintiff for that amount, and the defendant brings this appeal to reverse said judgment.

The second' count alleges substantially that a certain lot of merchandise was delivered to the defendant at St. Louis, Mo., on the 25th day of October, 1905, consigned to the plaintiff at Holdenville, Olda., by Butler Bros.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Blumle v. KramerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. Blocker v. McLendonCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1906

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Devonian Oil Corporation Ration v. HurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Buchner v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Downtown Chevrolet Co. v. LehmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Royal Crown Cola Bottling Co. of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API