Hale v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kiozva County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by C. B. Hale against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment sustaining demurrer for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PIARRISON, C.
This action was begun in the county 17, 1909, by C. B. Hale against the St. L. & S. E. Railroad Company for injuries alleged to have been received through the negligence of the company on November 20, 1907. Defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition was sustained on the ground that the petition showed on its face that the alleged injuries were received more than two years before the filing of the suit. Plaintiff refused to plead further, and brought the case here on a transcript.
case a foreign corporation which has refused to comply with the laws of the state by…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bauserman v. BluntSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Boardman v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. KeifferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Quinette v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- St. Louis & S. F. R. v. QuinetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BloomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.