Legal Opinion

Downtown Chevrolet Co. v. Lehman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 13, 1942No. 30550PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by Cal Lehman, a minor, by his father, George C. Lehman, as next friend, to recover for personal injuries suffered when the said Cal Lehman was run down by a hit-and-run driver at a street intersection in Tulsa, Okla., at approximately 11 p.m. September / 4, 1939.

The evidence introduced by the plaintiff tended reasonably to establish that at approximately 11 p.m. of September 4, 1939, Orvile McLehaney, while driving an automobile with automobile license No. BJ 227, ran down and injured Cal Lehman, a boy 15 years old, while he was crossing the street intersection. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tidal Oil Co. v. PeaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Coker v. MooseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Frederick Cotton Oil & Mfg. Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BloomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Duncan v. First Nat. Bank of HealdtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kinder v. GodfreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. J. R. Watkins Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Strom v. AndersonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1953
  4. Davis v. City of HenryettaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Thompson v. PollockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API