Hoehnan v. New York Drygoods Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from District Court, Bannock County. Notice of intention to move for a new trial was filed and served March 20, 1901. Time within which to prepare and serve statement on motion for new trial was extended by stipulation until April 16, 1901. Statement was served on attorney for respondent, April 6, 1901. There is nothing in the transcript to show that any amendments were ever proposed to said statement except the inference that might be drawn from .the statement of the…
Read the full summary
APPEAL from District Court, Bannock County. Notice of intention to move for a new trial was filed and served March 20, 1901. Time within which to prepare and serve statement on motion for new trial was extended by stipulation until April 16, 1901. Statement was served on attorney for respondent, April 6, 1901. There is nothing in the transcript to show that any amendments were ever proposed to said statement except the inference that might be drawn from .the statement of the court and affidavits. But admitting for the sake of argument that amendments were proposed and served, service was…
1Opinion of the CourtStockslager, J.
— This case is here on appeal from the district court of Bannock county. Two appeals were taken — • one from the judgment; the other from the order overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial. In the court below, respondents objected to the settlement of the statement on motion for a new trial, alleging that: “It appears from the record and files in the action, and the proposed statement: That judgment was rendered and entered upon a verdict of a jury against the defendants and in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of twelve hundred and fifty dollars and costs, thirty-four dollars and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Henry v. MerguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Connor v. S. Cal. Motor Rd. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Bunnel v. StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wills v. Rhen KongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bank of Commerce, Ltd. v. BaldwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Sherman v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Robinson v. St. Maries Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Sandstrom v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Simpson v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.