Legal Opinion

H. J. Heinz Company v. Duke

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 16, 1938No. 4-5074PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonham, J.

Appellant, Heinz Company, is a Pennsylvania corporation, not authorized to do business in Arkansas. Appellant, Hollis E. Luck, operates Luck’s Tourist Camp about one mile south of Hope, in Hemp-stead county, Arkansas, and, in connection with his camp, operates a cafe. Appellee, Roy L. Duke, lives at Prescott, Nevada county, Arkansas, and is an automobile salesman for De Lamar Chevrolet Company.

On November 2, 1937, between four and five o’clock in the afternoon, Duke ate a portion of a can of Heinz chili at Luck’s said tourist camp in Hope. Mrs. Lucille Luck, an old friend of Duke’s, served…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Order of Railway Conductors of America v. BandySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. ManionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Sillin v. Hessig-Ellis Drug CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fritchey v. SummarDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
  2. Omaha Hardwood Lumber Co. v. J. H. Phipps Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. McWhorter v. Anchor Serum Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1947
  4. McAvoy v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1960
  5. Chandler v. G. W. Gladder Towing Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API