Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCollum v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1964No. 5-3341Published

1DissentJim Johnson, Associate Justice

I do not agree with the majority opinion. I would affirm the judgment of the circuit court. The logic of its ruling in my view cannot be refuted. The opinion of the learned judge is hereby quoted in full as it lucidly presents the basis of my dissent.

“This court has no hesitancy in reversing the Commission in this case because the material facts are undisputed. Compensation thus resolves itself into a question of fact. Orvis Noel Rogers was a tractor driver of Gilbert R. McCollum, a lumber mill owner and logger, whoso Avoods crew at the time of Rogers’ death was engaged in cutting a tract…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Leilich v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. City of Milwaukee v. AlthoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Flanagan v. Webster & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Derleth v. Roach & Seeber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API