City of O'Neill v. Clark
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from tlie district court for Holt county. Tried below before Westovbr, J. References: Hall v. Vanie’r, 6 Neb..86; Murry v. Mills, 1 Neb. 456; Graces v. Scoville, 17 Neb. 593; W estover v. Armstrong, 24 Neb. 393.
1Opinion of the Court
■Irvine, 0.
The parties to this proceeding entered into the following agreement:
“Whereas, a controversy is now pending, between Mrs. Addie M. Clark, of O’Neill, Nebraska, and the city of of O’Neill, Nebraska, in relation to whether the said Mr,s!" Addie M. Clark was injured on the night of May 17, 1896, while walking on Benton street, in said city, on account of a defect in said street, .and if injured] to what extent, and as to whether, if an injury was sustained, the said city was and is liable therefor, and if liable, to what amount, and as to whether the said Mrs. Addie M. Clark, at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Slauter v. WhitelockIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Burkland v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Prather v. HartNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Murry v. MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
- Sides v. BrendlingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Mark Douglas Odom, United States of America v. Joyce Geraldine Beach, United States of America v. Benny Carol DysonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Fetty v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. RoundtreeNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
- Fraser v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.