Legal Opinion

Burkland v. Johnson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1897No. 7143PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the district court of Saunders county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

On the 27th of March, 1894, Emanuel G. Burkland and Charles A. Johnson submitted certain differences existing between them to arbitrators. The submission was in writing, duly signed by the parties, and acknowledged by them before a notary public. The arbitrators selected convened and, after a somewhat protracted investigation, made in writing their award as required by the agreement between Burkland and Johnson. The award, so far as material here, is as follows:

“First — We award that E. G. Burkland shall, on or before the 1st day of May, 1894,. pay and discharge the judgment and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Low v. NolteIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Miller v. BrumbaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. State v. GurneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  5. Connelly v. EdgertonNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. SteenNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Farmer v. Ames-Farmer Canning Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. Wilkinson v. PrichardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. City of O'Neill v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Schoenich v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API