Fraser v. Fraser
California Court of Appeal
APPEALS from a judgment and from an order of the Superior Court of Nevada County. George L. Jones, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE F. BUCK, J., pro tem.
This is an action brought to recover the sum of fifteen thousand dollars upon a rejected claim for services alleged to have been rendered decedent by plaintiff’s assignor. Upon the day set for the trial of the case plaintiff moved the court for a continuance upon the ground that plaintiff’s assignor, the real party in interest, was unable to be present and take part in the trial. Upon a hearing had, the court granted the continuance upon the condition that there be paid to defendants the sum of $120. Plaintiff refused to comply ivith this condition. He also refused…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moore v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. HopeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Pomeroy v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Muzzy v. D. H. McEwen Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. CarreonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- McFaddin v. H. S. Crocker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- State v. RoundtreeNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003
- Levine v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Wilkin v. TadlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.