Hanson v. Seawell
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, for Payette County. Hon. Ed. L. Bryan, Judge. A ction for trespass. Judgment for plaintiff. In actions for damages, the value of the thing injured at the time of the injury must be proved and the facts upon which the value is based must be given. (Axtell v. Northern Pac. By. Go., 9 Ida. 392, 74 Pac. 1075; McClain v. Lewiston etc. Assn., 17 Ida. 63, 20 Ann.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, for Payette County. Hon. Ed. L. Bryan, Judge. A ction for trespass. Judgment for plaintiff. In actions for damages, the value of the thing injured at the time of the injury must be proved and the facts upon which the value is based must be given. (Axtell v. Northern Pac. By. Go., 9 Ida. 392, 74 Pac. 1075; McClain v. Lewiston etc. Assn., 17 Ida. 63, 20 Ann. Cas. 60, 104 Pac. 1015, 25 L. R. A., N. S., 691; Jenkins v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 19 Ida. -290, 113 Pac. 463; Chicago etc. B. Co. v. Teese, 42 Okl. 188, 140 Pac. 1166, 52 L.…
1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.
This is an action for trespass tried originally in a justice’s court, resulting in judgment for respondent. On appeal to the district court it was tried by the court without a jury. The court found that the respondent was the holder and in possession of the land described in the complaint, that the defendant was the *94owner or reputed owner having in his charge, care and control, certain .sheep; that the defendant and his agents unlawfully permitted certain of his said sheep to go upon the lands of respondent, and that said sheep did eat up and tramp out certain grasses thereon growing to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. TaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Beaufort Land & Investment Co. v. New River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Risse v. CollinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Golden Gate Mill & Mining Co. v. Joshua Hendy Machine WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clark v. Utah Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Boggs v. SeawellIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Kellar v. SproatIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. PinelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Kingsbury v. BaconIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.