Legal Opinion

State v. Pond

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 13, 1989No. 88-378PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The defendant appeals his two convictions for felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:3, III, after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Dalianis, J.) and raises the following question for our review: whether the trial court impermissibly amended the felonious sexual assault indictments, which charged that the defendant acted knowingly, by instructing the jury that the State must prove the defendant acted purposely. We hold that the term “knowingly” in the indictments constituted harmless surplusage, and that the trial court properly instructed the jury that they must find the defendant acted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. State v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. WongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. State v. SpadeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. State v. EricksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  2. State v. BergmannSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. State v. Christina ThomasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  4. State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. State v. MorabitoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API