State v. Wong
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The central question posed by these consolidated appeals is whether the State must allege and prove the elements of criminal negligence as defined by the Criminal Code, RSA 626:2, 11(d), to sustain a conviction under section II of the negligent homicide statute, RSA 630:3. We hold that the culpability requirement of negligent homicide is satisfied upon proof of the fault element of section II: that a person operated a propelled vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or a controlled drug. RSA 630:3, II. We note that the State must establish a causal connection between the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bessie Cannon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- State v. ChaissonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Clinton HowardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- State v. DiStefanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- State v. SantanaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Hickingbotham v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.