State v. Spade
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBois, J.
On February 1, 1977, a jury found defendant guilty of receiving stolen goods in violation of RSA 637:7. During trial, the defendant took exception to the granting of the State’s motion to amend the date of the offense alleged in the indictment and to certain other rulings and instructions of the Court. All questions of law raised by these exceptions were reserved and transferred by Flynn, J. We affirm.
The original indictment read in part as follows:
Ralph R. Spade ... on the thirtieth day of April in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and seventy six . . . did knowingly receive a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. LinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
- State v. SkillingsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1955
- State v. KennardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. ThresherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. HatchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. StearnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. FennellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.