Legal Opinion

Gratton v. Gratton's Estate

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is suit by Arilla Gratton, -widow of Isaie Gratton, to set aside the will of her deceased husband upon the ground that it creates a perpetuity. The trial court sustained plaintiff’s contention in respect thereto and set aside the will. The correctness of this ruling is the principal question for decision upon this appeal.

From the record before us, it is uncertain at what stage of the proceedings the trial court ruled. There is a complaint, an answer, a demurrer to the answer, an order sustaining the demurrer and a reply to the answer, and no record of an amended answer having been filed.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fitchie v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Closset v. BurtchaellOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Whiteaker v. VanschoiackOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Bosma v. HarderOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Farnum v. LoomisOregon Supreme Court · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Agan v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Thomson v. Union National Bank in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Heilig v. DANIELOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Brown v. Security Savings & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API