Legal Opinion

Spialter v. Marzall

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 12, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 3085-49Published

1Opinion of the Court

PINE, District Judge.

This is an action under § 4915 R.S., 35 U.S.C. § 63, seeking an adjudication that plaintiff is entitled to a patent on a high wet strength paper and the method of making it. The process consists in subjecting a cellulose paper web to the action of silicon tetrachloride or some other inorganic halide of silicon or titanium in order to increase its wet strength. The basic reference is a patent to Callinan, No. 2394040, which teaches the treatment of an asbestos web with the same materials and for the same purpose. The sole issue is whether plaintiff, in following the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. In Re SwitzerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. Kissock v. Duquesne Steel Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  4. Naamlooze Venootschafs v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Krause v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API