Legal Opinion
Kissock v. Duquesne Steel Foundry Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 23, 1929No. 4070PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff appeals from a decree of the District Court dismissing his bill for infringement of Reissue Patent No. 16,396, granted to him on July 27, 1926 for a process of making alloy steel. Direct infringement of all claims was charged against Duquesne Steel Foundry Company and contributory infringement against Molybdenum Corporation of America. The court, passing by some of the defenses, found the reissue patent void because for an invention other than that disclosed by the original patent, or, if technically valid, still void because anticipated and for want of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Duer v. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- General Electric Co. v. De Forest Radio Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- Package Machinery Co. v. Johnson Automatic Sealer Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
3Cited by10 opinions
- Warner Bros. v. American Lady Corset Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- American Stainless Steel Co. v. Rustless Iron Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1933
- De Cew v. Union Bag & Paper CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1944
- Raffold Process Corp. v. Castanea Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Trubenizing Process Corp. v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.