Legal Opinion
Naamlooze Venootschafs v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 19, 1942No. 7978PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Associate Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia dismissing appellant’s complaint brought under Rev. Stat. § 4915 (1875), 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to issue to the appellant a patent containing claims 3, 4, 5, 9 and 10 of the application of Frederik A. Moller, appellant’s assignor, Serial No. 102,047. These claims, which we set forth in full in the margin,1 de*574scribe, and the application discloses, a process in which whole, unpeeled potatoes are subjected to the action of a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Naylor v. Alsop Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- General Electric Co. v. Laco-Philips Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Tyler v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hamilton Laboratories, Inc. v. MassengillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- La Maur, Inc. v. DeMert & Dougherty, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
- De Cew v. Union Bag & Paper Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
- Dow Chemical Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Douglas Aircraft Co. v. WeeksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.