Moore v. Continental Gin Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, McIntosh County; R. W. Higgins, Judge. 'Suit by the Continental Gin Company against T. E. Moore. Plaintiff’s motion for-judgment on -the pleadings sustained. Motion for new trial overruled, and case brought up by case-made and petition in error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SPRINGER, C.
In this opinion the plaintiff in error will be referred to as “defendant,” and the defendant in error will be referred to as the “company.”
The company brought suit against the defendant 'to recover against him a personal judgment for the sum of $606.25, which it claimed to be due as evidenced by certain promissory notes, and also for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage given as security of the notes. The defendant filed an answer containing two counts, the first of which is a general denial, and the second is a plea of payment of the indebtedness mentioned in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowers v. SchulerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Womack v. . CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Johnson v. Wilcox & Gibbs Sewing-Machine Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- Liston v. NailSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stolfa v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Cummins v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Elk City State Bank of Elk City v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Smith v. Interstate Securities CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955