Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Morris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 1938No. 27897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The complaint was stated in two causes of action, alleging liability of the defendant to the plaintiff on two separate promissory notes. A verdict was returned and judgment entered thereon for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict is not questioned. The only contention presented is that the trial court erred in overruling plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

The following from plaintiff’s brief is the entire argument for reversal as to the first cause of action;

“Payment must be specially pleaded, and it cannot be shown under a general…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Reserve Loan Life Ins. Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Moore v. Continental Gin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n v. LyonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Smith v. Interstate Securities CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API