Legal Opinion

Stolfa v. Gaines

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1929No. 18158PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The parties hereto appear in the same order as they did in the trial ■court, and for convenience they will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

The plaintiff filed a petition seeking to quiet the title toi the property involved in the action from certain claims of the defendant. Defendant answered and filed a counterclaim alleging title in the defendant, and the plaintiff replied by pleading the statute of limitations. When the case was called for trial, plaintiff dismissed his action and the defendant proceeded with his claim.

The trial court found that the deed issued pursuant to the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. Sharon v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Pillow v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Stone v. CaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Matter of Estate of SpeakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Gassin v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Williams v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Woods v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API