Legal Opinion

Womack v. . Carter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 23, 1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Peebles, J., at July Term, 1912, of Lee. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Walker.

1Opinion of the Court

"Walker, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover tbe sum of $1,140, and in bis complaint be states bis cause of action in three different ways: (1) That defendant’s testator took possession of certain land situated in Sanford Township, Moore County (now Lee County), tbe property of tbe plaintiff, leased tbe same to tenants and collected tbe rents for tbe use of tbe plaintiffs, to tbe amount of $1,140. That said amount has never been paid to plaintiffs, but is now held by defendant for their use. In tbe next count, if it may be so called, it is alleged, in substantially tbe same words, that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Conley v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Simpson v. Enfield Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Allen v. Carolina Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. New Bern Banking & Trust Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Hartsfield v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Price v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Davis v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Privette v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API