Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Thompson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from' District Court, Stutsman County; Winchester, J. Action by James Thompson against George Thompson. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWallin, C. J.

This is a claim and delivery action, brought to recover the possession of certain horses and mares belonging to the defendant, upon which the plaintiff has a chattel mortgage, given by the defendant to secure certain promissory notes of the defendant, described in the mortgage.. The complaint is not assailed for insufficiency, and the same embraces the usual allegations in such cases, embodying, among others, an allegation that the plaintiff is entitled to the possession of the property described in the mortgage, and that the plaintiff has demanded the possession of the property from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myrick v. BillSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1883
  2. Consolidated Land & Irrigation Co. v. HawleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Breitenwischer v. CloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Guthrie v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Rodgers v. GrahamNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leaf v. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Butler v. Wolf Sussman, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Jordan v. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Combs and Broderick, D/B/A v. KellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Combs and Broderick, D/B/A v. KellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API