Legal Opinion

Breitenwischer v. Clough

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Replevin by Henry Breitenwischer against Elmer Clough. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Plaintiff, a mortgagee of the premises, took a conveyance of a farm from a grantee of the mortgagor. At the time of the transfer the grantor’s son, the defendant, lived upon the place, and plaintiff claimed that, a few days later, the plaintiff went to the farm, where a talk was had between the plaintiff and defendant. The parties disagree about the nature of this transaction. The plaintiff claims that he then contracted to allow the defendant to put in a crop of wheat for one-third of the *7crop, to be delivered in the half-bushel, upon the place, and defendant was to remain in the house until…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitney v. McConnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Carl v. McGonigalMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Dayton v. Estate of DakinMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hyland v. Bohn Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Taylor v. Butters & Peters Salt & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Edoff v. HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Scovel v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Williams v. KniskernMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hagan v. MochMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API