Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Jordan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1922No. 11,151PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, C. J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment in an action in replevin instituted by appellee against appellant. The errors properly assigned are based on the actions of the court in stating each of its conclusions of law on the special finding of facts, and in overruling appellánt’s motion for a new trial.

Appellee contends that no question is presented by this appeal, since each proposition or point contained in appellant’s brief is based on an alleged special finding of facts and conclusions of law stated thereon, which are not a part of the record. It is the settled law in this state that a special…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Allen v. HollingsheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Kee & Chapell Dairy Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Coffinberry v. McClellanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Close v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wells v. WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Butler v. Wolf Sussman, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hays v. BurnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API