Legal Opinion
Combs and Broderick, D/B/A v. Keller
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 15, 1957No. 18,969Published
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Bowen, C. J.
2ConcurrenceDissenting opinion in which Cooper, J.
I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case.
At the close of appellants’ case in chief the appellees moved the court for a directed verdict as shown by the record as follows:
“Plaintiff presents evidence and now rests and at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence, defendants by their attorney move the court for a directed verdict, which reads as follows: (Here insert), and *539upon plaintiffs’ complaint herein, reserving the right to introduce evidence in the event the motion is overruled and now the plaintiffs join in said motion for a directed verdict. The…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Butler v. Wolf Sussman, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Morgan v. WattlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Harris v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Thompson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Galesburg Coulter Disc Company v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.