Legal Opinion

Combs and Broderick, D/B/A v. Keller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1957No. 18,969Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Bowen, C. J.

2ConcurrenceDissenting opinion in which Cooper, J.

I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case.

At the close of appellants’ case in chief the appellees moved the court for a directed verdict as shown by the record as follows:

“Plaintiff presents evidence and now rests and at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence, defendants by their attorney move the court for a directed verdict, which reads as follows: (Here insert), and *539upon plaintiffs’ complaint herein, reserving the right to introduce evidence in the event the motion is overruled and now the plaintiffs join in said motion for a directed verdict. The…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Butler v. Wolf Sussman, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Morgan v. WattlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Harris v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Galesburg Coulter Disc Company v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API