Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brugmann

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 1, 1982PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The defendants were convicted of criminal trespass under G. L. c. 266, § 120, for occupying a restricted area at a nuclear power plant. The question presented is whether the trial judge erred in ruling that the defenses of necessity, self-defense and defense of others were not available at their trial. We hold that the ruling was correct and affirm the convictions.

On June 2, 1979, twenty-one persons, including the eleven defendants, walked past a barrier and sat down against the main gate by a fence at the Yankee Atomic Electric Company nuclear power plant in Rowe. The protestors apparently…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Northern States Power Company v. The State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  5. State v. MarleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. CapitoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. SchuchardtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. LenoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API