Commonwealth v. Brugmann
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
The defendants were convicted of criminal trespass under G. L. c. 266, § 120, for occupying a restricted area at a nuclear power plant. The question presented is whether the trial judge erred in ruling that the defenses of necessity, self-defense and defense of others were not available at their trial. We hold that the ruling was correct and affirm the convictions.
On June 2, 1979, twenty-one persons, including the eleven defendants, walked past a barrier and sat down against the main gate by a fence at the Yankee Atomic Electric Company nuclear power plant in Rowe. The protestors apparently…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Northern States Power Company v. The State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- State v. MarleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. CapitoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SchuchardtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. LenoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.