Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Connolly

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1985PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

This case requires us to define the phrase “while under the influence,” as used in G. L. c. 90, § 24 (1) (a) (1), as appearing in St. 1982, c. 373, § 2, the law that prohibits operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or other substances.

Robert Connolly was charged with operating a motor vehicle “while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.” When arrested, he refused to take a breathalyzer test. After he was convicted at a bench trial, he claimed a de nova jury trial.

The police officer who arrested Connolly testified at the jury trial as follows. He…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. People v. HaeusslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Commonwealth v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Commonwealth v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. People v. LambertMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AngiuloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. CantyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. BryerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. ColturiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API