Legal Opinion
Jurado v. Toys" R" US, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 2, 1993No. B064761PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.
We reverse an order dismissing Plaintiff Lillian Jurado’s slip-and-fall action against Defendant Toys “R” Us, Inc.
Facts
Jurado sued Toys “R” Us for personal injuries. The matter was initially set for trial on May 6, 1991, but was continued on the court’s own motion to July 16. On July 12, Jurado successfully moved for a continuance on the ground that her treating physician, Dr. Arthur Collins, had taken an “unexpected vacation” and was unavailable. Toys “R” Us did not oppose the motion, and trial was continued to November 12.
Later in July, Dr. Jacob Rabinovich…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Foster v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Baker v. BerremanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Betts Spring Co. v. Jardine MacHinery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roman v. LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Padda v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Padda v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Qaadir v. FigueroaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Qaadir v. FigueroaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.