Legal Opinion

Roman v. LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, INC.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 2008No. E042838PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Marlon Brando Roman, appeals from the trial court’s orders granting the motion of defendant Liberty University, Inc. (Liberty), to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction and granting the motion of defendant Shane Lucas Lancaster (Lancaster) on the ground of forum non conveniens. We find no error, and we affirm.

H. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Plaintiff’s Complaint

Plaintiff, through his guardian ad litem, filed an action for personal injury damages against defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California, County…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Investors Equity Life Holding Co. v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Hahn v. Diaz-BarbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Martinez v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Austin v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API