Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Taylor
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was in condemnation, and judgment was in favor of plaintiff, condemning the property and awarding defendants the total sum of $51.50 for the various items of damage. It may be stated that in their answer the defendants claimed that the proposed improvement would result in their damage to the extent of $63,000. Notwithstanding this great disparity between what was awarded and what was claimed there is abundant evidence to support the finding of the jury. However, the defendants were not present at the trial and no showing was made on their behalf, and this suggests the only serious…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jaffe v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Morehouse v. MorehouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Storer v. HeitfeldIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Betts Spring Co. v. Jardine MacHinery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by17 opinions
- Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Taylor v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Cohen v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Ross v. ThirlwallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Mann v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.