Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Bell
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1971No. Civ. 36631PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AISO, J.
Appeal from a judgment holding defendant Doris Kistler Bell liable on five promissory notes executed by her in favor of Joseph L. Taylor, together with prejudgment interest and costs of suit, less $2,500 for the fair value of her services in managing certain real properties for Taylor. Taylor died after the notes were delivered to him and plaintiff is the executor of his estate.
Defendant, who tried the case in propria persona and who prosecutes this appeal in similar capacity, 1 does not attack the judgment on its merits.
Her complaint on appeal is that the trial court, sitting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Larson v. SolbakkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Lombardi v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Manha v. Union Fertilizer Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Doran v. DreyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Nelson v. GauntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Wisniewski v. ClaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Gill v. Hall (In Re Hall)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Williams v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Foster v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.