Legal Opinion
Technical Tape Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1956PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BICKS, District Judge.
Technical Tape Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Tech Tape”, seeks a judgment declaring that United States Patent 2,177,627 is invalid and not infringed by the product it manufactures and markets under the trade name “Tuck”. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, the defendant, which will be referred to as “3 M”, has counterclaimed for an injunction against further infringement and damages.
The patent has been subjected to judicial scrutiny by the Courts in the Seventh Circuit and consistently upheld. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co. v. International Plastic Corp.,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Technical Tape Corporation v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Metal Film Company v. Metlon CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Dennison Manufacturing Co. v. Ben Clements & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Allied Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.