Legal Opinion

Haber v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 3, 1989No. 532-84TPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case before the court after trial on remand involves the applicability of a ten-year statute of limitations to the entitlement claimed by plaintiff Heinz Haber (“plaintiff”)1 to a foreign tax credit for the years 1970 and 1971 and the effect to be given a second notice disallowing plaintiff’s claims. See Haber v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 371 (1985), rev’d and remanded, 831 F.2d 1051 (Fed.Cir.1987), reh’g denied, 846 F.2d 1379 (Fed.Cir.1988).

BACKGROUND

In 1985 defendant moved to dismiss the complaint as time barred, since the notice of disallowance issued more than…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of Akin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  2. Rocovich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Amos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  4. Byrne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. LaFont v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API