Legal Opinion
Prade v. Jackson & Kelly
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Decided October 16, 1996No. Civil Action 3:94cv18PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MAXWELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed April 28, 1995. Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition to defendant’s motion on May 17,1995. On May 30, 1995, defendant filed a reply memorandum and on May 31,1995, plaintiffs filed a response to the reply.
On June 13, 1994, the complaint in this civil action was filed after the Court permitted Plaintiffs to proceed in forma pauperis. 1 On July 12, 1994, an Amended Complaint was filed and process was issued. On September 20, 1994, defendant filed its Answer and a demand for dismissal of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- J.D. Miller v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Carter v. Telectron, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Naas v. StolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Assaad-Faltas v. University of South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9187, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,833 Richard E. Naas Janet Naas v. Marc D. Stolman David Adrian National Business Factors Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Rolando Serna v. Law Office of Joseph Onwuteaka, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Rolando Serna v. Law Office of Joseph Onwuteaka, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013