Legal Opinion
Naas v. Stolman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1997No. 96-16789PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Richard and Janet Naas sued National Business Factors, Inc. and its attorneys, Adrian and Stolman, (collectively NBF) for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Act), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692a-1692o, and for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court exercised jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d), and 28 U.S.C. § 1367, and dismissed the Naases’ complaint without leave to amend, and dismissed the action. The Naases timely appealed, and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm and hold that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Nelda Mattson v. U.S. West Communications, Inc., Service Investment Corporation, Doing Business as Service Investment Collection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Maloy v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Torres v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Blakemore v. PekayDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Glover v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Platt Electrical Supply, Inc. v. Eoff Electrical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Dionte Tyler v. DH Capital Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.