Rolando Serna v. Law Office of Joseph Onwuteaka, e
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentJerry E. Smith, Circuit Judge
In the majority’s view, to “bring such action,” 15 U.S.C. § 1692i(a)(2), refers to something different from “[a]n action ... may be brought,” id. § 1692k(d). At first blush, that notion is counterintuitive; on careful examination, it is demonstrable error: Those nearly identical phrases are found in the same act and should be given the same meaning. I respectfully dissent.
I
A
To interpret “bring such action,” we ought to begin, “[a]s in any statutory construction ease[,] ... with the statutory text, and proceed from the understanding that [ujnless otherwise defined, statutory terms are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.