Legal Opinion
Comolli v. National Cash Register Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 14, 1929No. 7306PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
1. The verdict rendered on the state of facts set out in the
certified question was not contrary to law. Wooten v. Nall, 18 Ga. 609 (7), 624; Francis v. Dickel, 68 Ga. 255 (2); Austin v. Appling, 88 Ga. 54, 59 (13 8. E. 955) ; Lippincott v. Behre, 122 Ga. 543, 546 (50 S. E. 467) ; Burson v. Shields, 160 Ga. 723, 730 (129 S. E. 22).
2. Even if it would have been better practice to have first amended the petition, the admission of the evidence was not reversible error. The verdict as rendered affected only that defendant as to whom the evidence was material and relevant; and therefore the result…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Austin v. ApplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Burson v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Lippincott & Co. v. BehreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Francis v. Dickel & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Wooten & Co. v. NallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
3Cited by9 opinions
- Colson & Sons v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Maynard v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Comolli v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Farley v. GrooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- McMillan v. Shepard-Niles Crane & Hoist Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.