Legal Opinion

Francis v. Dickel & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1881PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Husband and Wife., Parties. Partnership. Verdict. Before Judge CLARK. City Court of Atlanta. June Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.

This suit was brought by George A. Dickel & Company against Thomas Francis and his wife, Mrs. Thomas Francis, as partners, doing business under the firm name of Thomas Francis, for the recovery of a bill of merchandise. Mrs. Francis filed pleas of the general issue, no partnership, and that she was a feme covert, being the wife of Thomas Francis.

Upon these pleas the parties went to trial, and the jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs against Mrs. Thomas Francis for the amount of the debt sued.

The legal effect of the verdict was to find that she was not a partner of Thomas…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wooten & Co. v. NallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  2. Huff v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schofield v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Waldrop v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Austin v. ApplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. Burson v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Curtis v. AshworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API