Legal Opinion
Maynard v. Rawlins
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 1, 1932No. 21648PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Secondary evidence, such as parol evidence, as to the contents of a written instrument, is sufficient to establish the contents of the instrument; and where it is admitted without objection, a verdict found in a suit to recover upon the instrument is not contrary to the evidence, upon the ground that the contents of the instrument were not proved. Munroe v. Baldwin, 145 Ga. 215 (88 S. E. 947) ; Georgia Coast &c. R. Co. v. Herrington, 14 Ga. App. 539 (81 S. E. 814).
2 The testimony of a witness delivered at a former trial of the same case between the same parties, when admitted in evidence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sibley v. American Exchange National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Munroe v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Merchants & Farmers Bank v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- American Exchange National Bank v. Georgia Construction & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Buckner v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reed v. Batson-Cook CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Armstrong Furniture Co. v. NickleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Wolfe v. Brown-Wright Hotel Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Bacon v. DECATUR FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Cummings v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.