Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Shepard-Niles Crane & Hoist Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1931No. 21108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

Shepard-Niles Crane and Hoist Corporation filed a declaration in attachment against T. A. Dyer and D. W. McMillan as a copartnership doing business under the name and style of Dyer & McMillan, alleging: that the partnership, by their *282agent Southern Metallurgical Company, ordered from plaintiff two cranes and hoists for a stipulated price; that the agency of the Southern Metallurgical Company was not disclosed until after shipment of the goods, hut that said company was duly authorized by the partnership to place the order with plaintiff; that the machinery was manufactured and shipped in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Hirsch v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Crockett & Co. v. Garrard & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Francis v. Dickel & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Stricklin & Co. v. CrawleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harvey v. DeWeillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. McMillan v. GilmourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API