Legal Opinion

State v. Chambliss, 91272 (10-9-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2008No. 91272UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Dantae Chambliss, James Bennett, and Travis Sanders, appeal the trial court's judgments removing their respective counsel, remanding them to the county jail, and ordering them to retain new counsel.

{¶ 2} Appellants were indicted on several drug-related offenses, and each retained his own attorney. The charges carried mandatory prison time. All three appellants posted the bonds that were set for them, and were released pending trial. Appellants filed various pretrial motions, including motions to compel production of the search warrant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ChamblissOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. ChamblissOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. ChamblissOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API