State v. Payne
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} This appeal comes to us in the wake of our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470. Foster, following Blakely v. Washington (2004), 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403, held that statutes that required “judicial fact-finding before imposition of a sentence greater than the maximum term authorized by a jury verdict or admission of the defendant” violated a defendant’s right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Foster, paragraph one of the syllabus. The issue confronting us now is whether, when…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by642 opinions
- State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
637 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.